Portal Home > Knowledgebase > Articles Database > APF vs CSF? Or can I have both?


APF vs CSF? Or can I have both?




Posted by killerlipz, 03-14-2012, 04:20 AM
APF vs CSF? Or can I have both? Which one is easier to use and much mor effective?

Posted by CrocWeb, 03-14-2012, 04:22 AM
I prefer CSF, you should use one only.

Posted by manhalab, 03-14-2012, 04:35 AM
If you are on cpanel .. go for csf

Posted by BiggyMike, 03-15-2012, 11:02 PM
You don't need both. Use the one you like the best.

Posted by dale, 03-15-2012, 11:03 PM
One vote for csf!

Posted by hostingxchange, 03-15-2012, 11:11 PM
If you use WHM and CPanel, then CSF will provide you with a graphical interface via a WHM plugin. It also provides you with some of the best advice you can find anywhere on the proper methods with which you should harden your server.

Posted by AcuNett, 03-15-2012, 11:17 PM
CSF is more intuitive and more actively developed/updated. Do not use both.

Posted by GeekDub, 03-15-2012, 11:23 PM
Most people will tell you CSF, this has not changed for years and I agree. http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=682599

Posted by killerlipz, 03-16-2012, 01:15 AM
Thanks guys! CSF is now up and running!

Posted by ALEXEI_M, 03-17-2012, 12:18 AM
I have never used anything other than CSF. But I think CSF is better than APF. Easy interface in WHM. Easy updates

Posted by BassHost, 03-17-2012, 02:49 AM
I would say CSF. CSF says not to have either APF or BFD installed at the same time.



Was this answer helpful?

Add to Favourites Add to Favourites    Print this Article Print this Article

Also Read
resellerzoom offline? (Views: 861)
MyQoS License wanted (Views: 862)


Language:

LoadingRetrieving latest tweet...

Back to Top Copyright © 2018 DC International LLC. - All Rights Reserved.