Portal Home > Knowledgebase > Articles Database > which one works best with cloudlinux? suPHP or fastcgi?
which one works best with cloudlinux? suPHP or fastcgi?
| Posted by ServerZoo, 08-13-2012, 01:05 PM |
| I heard before that cloudlinux+fastcgi gives bad performance, what is the situation now? which one works best in terms of security+performance balance?
|
| Posted by pmabraham, 08-14-2012, 09:41 AM |
| Good day:
http://www.cloudlinux.com/blog/clnews/199.php might be of interest.
Thank you.
|
| Posted by ServerZoo, 08-21-2012, 12:03 PM |
| thanks for sharing, that article is pretty nice
|
| Posted by Drxx, 08-22-2012, 08:18 AM |
| Hi,
+ Read this too http://www.cloudlinux.com/blog/clnew...-and-fcgid.php
Good Luck
|
| Posted by racknap1, 08-22-2012, 12:11 PM |
| Hi,
eAccelerator will not work with php running as suPHP.
I personally do on an overloaded box is switch suphp to fastcgi. It allows for php caching to be setup, and generally has a lower CPU overhead than suPHP.
While suPHP is a great thing, some situations and configurations require something else. If you intend on using eA or any other caching, then fastcgi or DSO would be the way to go. If you have no plan on using caching, and don't have load issues, then there's no reason not to run suPHP.
|
| Posted by BestServerSupport, 08-22-2012, 12:23 PM |
| The only difference I feel between suPHP and FastCGI is about performance.
FastCGI is suitable for high traffic websites whereas suPHP is for low traffic websites [suphp spawns a new cgi process for every page request].
Both are secure and PHP processes runs under user account ownership.
|
Add to Favourites 
Print this Article
Also Read
